PATCH_LIBTOOL_CHANGING_CMDS_IFS
,
Guido U. Draheim <guidod@gmx.de>
GPLWithACException
This program is free software; you can
redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
as published by the Free Software Foundation. As a special exception, the respective
Autoconf Macro's copyright owner gives unlimited permission to copy, distribute and modify
the configure scripts that are the output of Autoconf when processing the Macro. You
need not follow the terms of the
GNU General Public License when using or distributing such scripts
guidod's Miscellaneous (released)
Do a `grep "^[a-z]*_cmds=" libtool` - these are "subroutines"
encoded by libtool.m4 into the generated libtool script. Since
libtool assumes that there is no subroutine-facility in the shell
invoked, these are not actually subroutines, but actually a "list
of commands". This looks correct, but the command separator is not
";" - it is "~", the tilde character.
Now, grep again, look for `grep 'IFS="~"' libtool` and see that
libtool scripting uses a for-loop on the command-list, i.e for cmd
in $some_cmds. This works correctly when the IFS was modified,
where IFS stands for "input field separator" which is whitespace
characters by default.
The problem: I have some real-world filesystems where there are
directories using "~" inside of them, to be more to the point, it
is a change control management software that uses source
repositories of the form "path/master/project~version/src" and
libtool has the tendency to resolve any symlinks so that it will
paste such path into the $_cmds script when it gets evaluated a
number of times.
This script is a workaround: I do not know why the ";" was not
chosen as the IFS, perhaps it has some weird interactions in some
shells since it is also the default record separator being one time
bigger in context than the argument separator. I have made good
success however with using "?" as the IFS, since there is no
path-name that uses a question mark, and there is no _cmds ever
around that uses "?" for some thing.
Oh yes, there are some usages of "*" to match shell-wise at the
output file of some tool, so that might have triggered the choice
to not use "?" in the first place - but in real life it never
occured that a _cmds script was created that has gone to use "?".
And so, this ac-macro exchanges the s/~/?/g in configured _cmds
variables and replaces all occurences of s/IFS="~"/IFS="?"/ - and
it all works smooth now.
AC_DEFUN([PATCH_LIBTOOL_CHANGING_CMDS_IFS],
[# patch libtool to change $_cmds IFS from ~ to ? character
if grep "^[[_$as_cr_letters]]_cmds=.*[[?]]" libtool >/dev/null; then
AC_MSG_WARN(dnl
[patching libtool skipped - _cmds already contain question marks])
else
AC_MSG_RESULT([patching libtool to change cmds IFS from ~ to ?])
test -f libtool.old || (mv libtool libtool.old && cp libtool.old libtool)
sed -e "/^[[_$as_cr_letters]]*_cmds=/s/~/?/g" -e 's/IFS="~"/IFS="?"/g' \
-e "s/IFS='~'/IFS='?'/g" libtool > libtool.new
(test -s libtool.new || rm libtool.new) 2>/dev/null
test -f libtool.new && mv libtool.new libtool # not 2>/dev/null !!
test -f libtool || mv libtool.old libtool
fi
])